Table of Contents

SouthCoast Offshore Wind Project Faces Potential Delays Due to Trump-Era Policies

SouthCoast Offshore Wind Project Faces Potential Delays Due to Trump Policies

Introduction

The SouthCoast Wind project, formerly known as Mayflower Wind, is one of the most ambitious offshore wind energy initiatives in the United States. Located approximately 30 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard and 20 miles south of Nantucket, the project aims to generate up to 2,400 megawatts (MW) of clean, renewable energy—enough to power over 1 million homes. However, despite its promise, the project is facing potential delays and regulatory hurdles, many of which stem from policies and decisions made during the Trump administration. These challenges highlight the complex interplay between federal policy, environmental regulation, and the urgent need for renewable energy development.

Background: The Rise of Offshore Wind in the U.S.

Offshore wind energy has gained significant traction in the United States over the past decade. With vast wind resources along the Atlantic coast, the U.S. has the potential to generate more than 2,000 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind energy, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Recognizing this potential, several states—including Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey—have set aggressive targets for offshore wind deployment.

Massachusetts and the SouthCoast Wind Project

Massachusetts has been a leader in offshore wind development. The state’s 2016 Energy Diversity Act mandated the procurement of 1,600 MW of offshore wind by 2027, a target that has since been increased. The SouthCoast Wind project is a key component of this strategy. Jointly developed by Shell New Energies and Ocean Winds North America, the project is expected to play a critical role in helping Massachusetts meet its climate goals and reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

Trump-Era Policies and Their Impact

Despite growing momentum for offshore wind, the Trump administration adopted a more cautious—and at times obstructive—approach to renewable energy development. Several policies and regulatory decisions made during this period have had lasting effects on projects like SouthCoast Wind.

1. Delays in Environmental Reviews

One of the most significant impacts of the Trump administration was the slowdown in environmental permitting processes. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), the federal agency responsible for overseeing offshore energy development, delayed the release of key environmental impact statements (EIS) for several projects, including Vineyard Wind, a neighboring project to SouthCoast Wind.

In 2019, BOEM announced it would conduct a cumulative impact analysis of all proposed offshore wind projects along the East Coast, citing concerns about their collective impact on marine ecosystems and commercial fishing.
This decision led to a delay of more than a year for Vineyard Wind’s final EIS, setting a precedent that has affected subsequent projects like SouthCoast Wind.

2. Regulatory Uncertainty

The Trump administration’s broader deregulatory agenda created uncertainty for renewable energy developers. While the administration rolled back numerous environmental protections, it also failed to provide clear guidance or support for offshore wind. This lack of direction made it difficult for developers to plan long-term investments and navigate the permitting process.

3. Favoring Fossil Fuels

Throughout his term, President Trump consistently promoted fossil fuel development, including offshore oil and gas drilling. This policy orientation diverted attention and resources away from renewable energy initiatives. In some cases, it also led to conflicts over ocean space, as oil and gas leases were prioritized over wind energy areas.

Current Status of the SouthCoast Wind Project

As of 2024, the SouthCoast Wind project is progressing but faces several challenges that could delay its timeline. The developers have submitted their Construction and Operations Plan (COP) to BOEM, and the agency is currently conducting an environmental review. However, the legacy of Trump-era delays and regulatory bottlenecks continues to loom large.

Transmission and Grid Integration

One of the key technical challenges for SouthCoast Wind is the integration of its power into the regional grid. The project plans to bring electricity ashore via underground cables to substations in Massachusetts. However, this requires coordination with local utilities, upgrades to existing infrastructure, and additional environmental reviews—all of which can be time-consuming.

Supply Chain and Inflationary Pressures

In addition to regulatory hurdles, the project is also grappling with supply chain disruptions and rising costs. The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent global economic shifts have led to shortages of key components such as turbines, cables, and vessels. Inflation has further increased the cost of materials and labor, putting financial pressure on developers.

Case Study: Vineyard Wind as a Precedent

The experience of Vineyard Wind, the first commercial-scale offshore wind project in the U.S., offers valuable insights into the challenges facing SouthCoast Wind.

Vineyard Wind faced a 13-month delay in its federal permitting process due to the Trump administration’s decision to conduct a cumulative impact analysis.
Despite these setbacks, the project ultimately received approval in 2021 under the Biden administration and began construction in 2022.
The project is expected to generate 800 MW of electricity and serve as a model for future offshore wind developments.

While Vineyard Wind’s eventual success is encouraging, it also underscores the importance of consistent federal support and streamlined permitting processes—factors that remain uncertain for SouthCoast Wind.

Environmental and Economic Implications

The potential delays to SouthCoast Wind have significant environmental and economic implications. Offshore wind is a cornerstone of Massachusetts’ strategy to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Any setbacks could hinder the state’s ability to meet its climate goals.

Environmental Benefits at Stake

According to estimates, the full build-out of SouthCoast Wind could offset approximately 4 million metric tons of carbon dioxide annually—the equivalent of removing nearly 900,000 cars from the road. Delays in the project mean continued reliance on fossil fuels and higher emissions in the short term.

Job Creation and Economic Growth

The offshore wind industry is also a major driver of economic development. The SouthCoast Wind project is expected to create thousands of jobs in construction, manufacturing, and operations. It will also stimulate investment in port infrastructure and supply chain facilities across the region.

Massachusetts has already invested over $100 million in upgrading the New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal to support offshore wind staging and assembly.
Local educational institutions are developing training programs to prepare workers for careers in offshore wind.

Federal Policy Shifts Under the Biden Administration

Since taking office in 202